Decisions
Alan has appeared at many different courts and tribunals to try claims for his clients over the past 23 years. Successful preparation is important to try to avoid a trial and to successfully resolve a claim. Unfortunately, sometimes insurance companies refuse to settle claims fairly or reasonably, and sometimes do not assess the claim correctly. When this happens, you have to try your case.
Alan will try your case if necessary. Below is a sample of some of Alan's recent written decisions following trials, appeals, hearings, and motions in the superior court and at the financial services commission of Ontario.
Please review Al's latest rulings and decisions. Alan Clausi will stand up for you.
In Amouri v. Hansen et al, following the settlement of the plaintiff’s claim for damages, the defendant refused to pay reasonable costs and disbursements claimed by Ms. Amouri’s lawyer. The…
Fayaz Al-Wadaan vs. Aviva General Insurance Company – Tribunal File No: 18-008742/AABS Adjudicator – Brian Norris , Alan J. Clausi – counsel for the applicant, Michelle Friedman – counsel for…
Zein and Beauregard – Court File No. 16-68`70 Master Foutier – Counsel – Alan Clausi for the plaintiff, moving – Kelly Hart for the defendant, responding party. Alan’s motion for…
Aviva Canada Inc. and Yeshitla Dadi – Commission Appeal File No. P17-00074 October 23, 2018 James Brown – lawyer for Aviva Canada – Appellant Alan Clausi – lawyer for Yeshitla…
Arbitration – FSCO A16-004703 Alan Clausi – lawyer for Mr. Dadi – Applicant Alex Robineau and James Brown – lawyers for Aviva Canada Inc. – Respondent The Arbitration of…
After a three week trial, the Jury returned to Alan’s client a verdict of $65,000.00 in general damages and $175,000.00 in income loss, and found the plaintiff 30% contributorily negligent…
The defendants brought a threshold motion at the completion of the trial, seeking an order declaring that Alan’s client, the plaintiff, had not sustained a permanent and serious impairment of…
Alan’s client, the plaintiff brought a motion after closing arguments to strike the jury. The plaintiff argued that the defendant’s comments in closing arguments that her claim was a “cash…
The defendants brought a motion near the end of the trial to call a second physiatrist. The Court ruled that the defendants should be limited to one expert per specialty.…
The defendants brought a motion part way through this civil jury trial, after the plaintiff’s evidence was complete. All witnesses called by the plaintiff, including experts, had been examined and…
Contact us now with respect to your possible personal injury case.
FREE NO-OBLIGATION CONSULTATION
